1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 958 F.3d
  5. 958 F.3d 767 (2020)
 

DANIELS v. WALT DISNEY CO.

No. 18-55635.

958 F.3d 767 (2020)

Denise DANIELS; The Moodsters Company, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. The WALT DISNEY COMPANY; Disney Enterprises, Inc.; Disney Consumer Products and Interactive Media Inc.; Disney Interactive Studios, Inc.; Disney Shopping, Inc.; Pixar, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Filed March 16, 2020.

Decided May 4, 2020.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Patrick Arenz, Esq. (argued), Ronald J. Schutz and Brenda L. Joly , Robins Kaplan LLP, Minneapolis, Minnesota, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.

Mark Remy Yohalem, Esq. (argued), Glenn D. Pomerantz , Erin J. Cox , Kenneth M. Trujillo-Jamison , and Anne K. Conley , Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP, Los Angeles, California, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before: Jerome Farris, M. Margaret McKeown, and Barrington D. Parker, Jr., Circuit Judges.

ORDER

The opinion filed on March 16, 2020, slip op. 18-55635, and appearing at 952 F.3d 1149, is hereby amended. An amended opinion is filed concurrently with this order.

With these amendments, the panel has voted to deny the petition for panel rehearing.

The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc and no judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R. App. P. 35.

The petition...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases