1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 955 F.3d
  5. 955 F.3d 1358 (2020)
 

CARDIONET, LLC v. INFOBIONIC, INC.

2019-1149.

955 F.3d 1358 (2020)

CARDIONET, LLC, Braemar Manufacturing, LLC, Plaintiffs-Appellants v. INFOBIONIC, INC, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Decided: April 17, 2020.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ching-Lee Fukuda , Sidley Austin LLP, New York, NY, argued for plaintiffs-appellants. Also represented by Bradford J. Badke , Todd Matthew Simpson ; Nathan A. Greenblatt , Palo Alto, CA.

Gabriel Bell , Latham & Watkins LLP, Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by Maximilian A. Grant ; Charles Sanders , Boston, MA.

Opinion dissenting in part and concurring in the result filed by Circuit Judge Dyk.

CardioNet, LLC and Braemar Manufacturing, LLC (collectively, "CardioNet") appeal the district court's dismissal of their patent infringement complaint against InfoBionic, Inc. The district court held that the asserted claims of CardioNet's U.S. Patent No. 7,941,207 are ineligible...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases