1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 955 F.3d
  5. 955 F.3d 35 (2020)
 

NEVRO CORP. v. BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORP.

2018-2220, 2018-2349.

955 F.3d 35 (2020)

NEVRO CORP., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION, Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation, Defendants-Cross-Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Decided: April 9, 2020.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Deanne Maynard , Morrison & Foerster LLP, Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by Seth W. Lloyd , Brian Robert Matsui ; Bita Rahebi , Los Angeles, CA; Kenneth Alexander Kuwayti , Eric C. Pai , Palo Alto, CA; Michael Allen Jacobs , San Francisco, CA; Bradford J. Badke , Ching-Lee Fukuda , Sidley Austin LLP, New York, NY; Ryan C. Morris , Carter Glasgow Phillips , Washington, DC.

Matthew Wolf , Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP, Washington, DC, argued for defendants-cross-appellants. Also represented by Marc A. Cohn , Edward Han ; Thomas T. Carmack , Krista Marie Carter , Palo Alto, CA.

Before Moore, Taranto, and Chen, Circuit Judges.

Nevro Corporation sued Boston Scientific Corporation and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation (collectively, Boston Scientific) in the Northern District of California, alleging infringement of eighteen claims across seven patents: U.S. Patent Nos. 8,359,102; 8,712,533; 8,768...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases