GADELHAK v. AT&T SERVICES, INC.

No. 19-1738.

950 F.3d 458 (2020)

Ali GADELHAK, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AT&T SERVICES, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Decided February 19, 2020.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Keith J. Keogh , Timothy J. Sostrin , Attorneys, KEOGH LAW, LTD, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Hans Germann , Kyle J. Steinmetz , Attorneys, MAYER BROWN LLP, Chicago, IL, Andrew John Pincus , Attorney, MAYER BROWN LLP, Washington, DC, for Defendant-Appellee.

Marc Rotenberg , Attorney, ELECTRONIC PRIVACY INFORMATION CENTER, Washington, DC, Amici Curiae ELECTRONIC PRIVACY INFORMATION CENTER and NATIONAL CONSUMER LAW CENTER, INCORPORATED.

Shay Dvoretzky , Attorney, JONES DAY, Washington, DC, for Amicus Curiae CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.

Steven Gregory White , Attorney, GRAY REED & McGRAW LLP, Dallas, TX, for Amicus Curiae ACA INTERNATIONAL.

Before Wood, Chief Judge, and Kanne and Barrett, Circuit Judges.


The wording of the provision that we interpret today is enough to make a grammarian throw down her pen. The Telephone Consumer Protection Act bars certain uses of an "automatic telephone dialing system," which it defines as equipment with the capacity "to store or produce telephone numbers to be called, using a random or...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases