1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 946 F.3d
  5. 946 F.3d 855 (2020)
 

BUCHHOLZ v. MEYER NJUS TANICK, PA

No. 18-2261.

946 F.3d 855 (2020)

Gustav BUCHHOLZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MEYER NJUS TANICK, PA, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Decided and Filed: January 3, 2020.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

ARGUED: Philip D. Stern , STERN THOMASSON LLP, Springfield, New Jersey, for Appellant. Kathleen H. Klaus , MADDIN HAUSER ROTH & HELLER, Southfield, Michigan, for Appellee. ON BRIEF: Philip D. Stern , Andrew T. Thomasson , Francis R. Greene , STERN THOMASSON LLP, Springfield, New Jersey, for Appellant. Kathleen H. Klaus , MADDIN HAUSER ROTH & HELLER, Southfield, Michigan, for Appellee.

NALBANDIAN, J., delivered the opinion of the court in which COOK, J., joined, and MURPHY, J., joined in part. MURPHY, J. (pp. 870-75), delivered a separate opinion concurring in part and in the judgment.

OPINION

Gustav Buchholz received two letters from law firm Meyer Njus Tanick, PA ("MNT") about two debts he owed to Synchrony Bank. The letters, which appeared on MNT letterhead and were signed by an MNT attorney, informed Buchholz that MNT was acting as a debt collector and provided contact information for him...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases