1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 942 F.3d
  5. 942 F.3d 1363 (2019)
 

IN RE IPR LICENSING, INC.

2018-1805.

942 F.3d 1363 (2019)

IN RE: IPR LICENSING, INC., Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Decided: November 22, 2019.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gabriel Bell , Latham & Watkins LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellant. Also represented by Richard P. Bress , Maximilian A. Grant , Jonathan M. Strang ; Julie M. Holloway , San Francisco, CA.

Before Newman, O'Malley, and Taranto, Circuit Judges.

This case returns to us after remand to the Patent Trial and Appeal Board ("the Board"). In the previous appeal, we affirmed the Board's findings that claims 1-7, 14-16, 19-29, 36-38, and 41-44 of U.S. Patent 8,380,244 ("the '244 patent") were obvious based on prior art references cited in ground one of ZTE's petition, the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases