U.S. v. NORRIS

No. 17-10354.

938 F.3d 1114 (2019)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Alexander Nathan NORRIS, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Filed September 18, 2019.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John Paul Balazs (argued), Sacramento, California, for Defendant-Appellant.

Matthew G. Morris (argued) and Shelley D. Weger , Assistant United States Attorneys; Camil A. Skipper , Appellate Chief; McGregor W. Scott , United States Attorney; United States Attorney's Office, Sacramento, California; for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Before: Mary M. Schroeder, Diarmuid F. O'Scannlain, and Johnnie B. Rawlinson, Circuit Judges.


OPINION

To resolve this case, we must once again venture into the intersection of technology and the Fourth Amendment. Defendant-Appellant Alexander Nathan Norris (Norris) seeks to have us apply the protections of the Fourth Amendment to the use of a wireless tracking program to identify the address of his wireless...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases