1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 939 F.3d
  5. 939 F.3d 1355 (2019)
 

AMERICAN AXLE & MANUFACTURING v. NEAPCO HOLDINGS

2018-1763.

939 F.3d 1355 (2019)

AMERICAN AXLE & MANUFACTURING, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NEAPCO HOLDINGS LLC, Neapco Drivelines LLC, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Decided: October 3, 2019.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James Richard Nuttall , Steptoe & Johnson, LLP, Chicago, IL, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by John Lloyd Abramic , Katherine H. Johnson , Robert Kappers .

Dennis J. Abdelnour , Honigman LLP, Chicago, IL, argued for defendants-appellees. Also represented by J. Michael Huget , Sarah E. Waidelich , Ann Arbor, MI.

Scott A. M. Chambers , Porzio, Bromberg & Newman, PC, Washington, DC, for amici curiae Christopher Frerking, Christopher Michael Holman, David Lund, Walter Matystik, Adam Mossoff, Kristen J. Osenga, Michael Risch, Mark F. Schultz, Ted M. Sichelman, Brenda M. Simon, Jonathan Stroud, David O. Taylor. Also represented by Matthew Zapadka , Bass, Berry & Sims, PLC, Washington, DC.

Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge Moore.

American Axle & Manufacturing, Inc. ("AAM") sued Neapco Holdings LLC and Neapco Drivelines LLC (collectively, "Neapco") alleging infringement of claims of U.S. Patent No. 7,774,911 ("the '911 patent").1 The parties filed cross-motions for summary judgment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases