ENZO LIFE SCIENCES v. ROCHE MOLECULAR SYSTEMS

2017-2498, 2017-2499, 2017-2545, 2017-2546.

928 F.3d 1340 (2019)

ENZO LIFE SCIENCES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ROCHE MOLECULAR SYSTEMS, INC., Roche Diagnostics Corporation, Roche Diagnostics Operations, Inc., Roche Nimblegen, Inc., Becton, Dickinson and Company, aka Becton Dickson and Company, Becton Dickinson Diagnostics Inc., aka Becton Dickson Diagnostics, GeneOhm Sciences Inc., Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Molecular, Inc., Defendants-appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Public Opinion Issued: July 5, 2019.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Justin P.D. Wilcox , Desmarais LLP, New York, NY, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by John M. Desmarais ; Peter Curtis Magic , San Francisco, CA.

Matthew Wolf , Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP, Washington, DC, argued for defendants-appellees Roche Molecular Systems, Inc., Roche Diagnostics Corporation, Roche Diagnostics Operations, Inc., Roche NimbleGen, Inc., Becton, Dickinson and Company, Becton Dickinson Diagnostics Inc., GeneOhm Sciences Inc.

John C. O'Quinn , Kirkland & Ellis LLP, Washington, DC, argued for defendants-appellees Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Molecular, Inc. Also represented by Michael Pearson , Jason M. Wilcox ; James F. Hurst , Amanda J. Hollis , Chicago, IL; Benjamin Adam Lasky, New York, NY.

Omar Khan , Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, New York, NY, for defendants-appellees Roche Molecular Systems, Inc., Roche Diagnostics Corporation, Roche Diagnostics Operations, Inc., Roche NimbleGen, Inc., Becton Dickinson and Company, Becton Dickinson Diagnostics Inc., GeneOhm Sciences Inc. Also represented by Robert J. Gunther, Jr. , Christopher R. Noyes ; William G. McElwain , Thomas Saunders , Washington, DC.

Before Prost, Chief Judge, Reyna and Wallach, Circuit Judges.


Enzo Life Sciences, Inc. ("Enzo") appeals the decision of the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware granting summary judgment against Enzo and holding that the asserted claims are invalid for lack of enablement. We affirm as to non-enablement and do not reach the other issues presented on appeal.

I

...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases