1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. HOLOGIC, INC. v. MINERVA SURGICAL, INC.
 

HOLOGIC, INC. v. MINERVA SURGICAL, INC.

No. 2018-1550.

HOLOGIC, INC., Appellant, v. MINERVA SURGICAL, INC., Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Decided: April 19, 2019.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

MATTHEW M. WOLF , Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellant. Also represented by MARC A. COHN ; JENNIFER SKLENAR , Los Angeles, CA; SEAN MICHAEL CALLAGY , San Francisco, CA.

MICHAEL T. ROSATO , Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, PC, Seattle, WA, argued for appellee. Also represented by STEVEN W. PARMELEE ; MATTHEW A. ARGENTI , Palo Alto, CA.

Before NEWMAN, REYNA, and HUGHES, Circuit Judges.

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

This is a patent case involving a method to detect per-forations during uterine ablation. Hologic, Inc., appeals a decision of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board finding claims of U.S. Patent No. 6,872,183 unpatentable as obvious. See Minerva Surgical, Inc. v. Hologic...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases