U.S. v. MARTIROSSIAN

18-4035, 18-4114.

917 F.3d 883 (2019)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Azat MARTIROSSIAN, Defendant-Appellant. In re: Azat Martirossian, Petitioner.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Decided and Filed: March 7, 2019.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

ON RESPONSE TO SHOW CAUSE ORDER AND PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS: Homer E. Moyer, Jr. , Preston L. Pugh , Ann K. Sultan , Katherine E. Pappas , MILLER & CHEVALIER CHARTERED, Washington, D.C., Armen Kharazian , LAW OFFICES OF ARMEN KHARAZIAN PLLC, Washington, D.C., for Azat Martirossian. ON REPLY: Jeremy R. Sanders , UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for United States in 18-4035.

Before: NORRIS, SUTTON, and COOK, Circuit Judges.


OPINION

Federal courts do not play "catch me if you can." If a defendant refuses to show up to answer an indictment, ignores an arrest warrant, or leaves the jurisdiction, the court may decline to resolve any objections to the indictment in his absence. What is known loosely as the fugitive disentitlement doctrine...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases