1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 912 F.3d
  5. 912 F.3d 1358 (2019)
 

AC TECHNOLOGIES S.A. v. AMAZON.COM, INC.

2018-1433.

912 F.3d 1358 (2019)

AC TECHNOLOGIES S.A., Appellant v. AMAZON.COM, INC., Blizzard Entertainment, Inc., Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Decided: January 9, 2019.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

MINGHUI YANG , Hardy Parrish Yang, LLP, Austin, TX, argued for appellant. Also represented by VICTOR G. HARDY ; ANDREW DINOVO , NICOLE E. GLAUSER , DiNovo, Price, Ellwanger & Hardy LLP.

DANIEL T. SHVODIAN , Perkins Coie, LLP, Palo Alto, CA, argued for appellees. Also represented by CHRISTOPHER LEE KELLEY , WING LIANG , VICTORIA Q. SMITH ; DAN L. BAGATELL , Hanover, NH.

Before Moore, Schall, and Stoll, Circuit Judges.

The Patent Trial and Appeal Board issued a final written decision ruling certain claims of AC Technologies S.A.'s U.S. Patent No. 7,904,680 unpatentable. On reconsideration, it invalidated the remaining claims based on a ground of unpatentability raised by Amazon.com, Inc. and Blizzard Entertainment, Inc. (collectively, "Amazon...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases