1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 912 F.3d
  5. 912 F.3d 1192 (2019)
 

ZABRISKIE v. FEDERAL NAT. MORTG. ASSOCIATION

Nos. 17-15807, 17-16000.

912 F.3d 1192 (2019)

Richard ZABRISKIE; Kristin Zabriskie, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Filed January 9, 2019.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Deanne E. Maynard (argued), Brian E. Matsui, and Seth W. Lloyd, Morrison & Foerster LLP, Washington, D.C.; Michael Miller, Morrison & Foerster LLP, New York, New York; for Defendant-Appellant.

Sylvia A. Goldsmith (argued), Goldsmith & Associates, LLC, Rocky River, Ohio; Paul B. Mengedoth, Mengedoth Law PLLC, Scottsdale, Arizona; for Plaintiffs-Appellees.

Dinita L. James, Gonzalez Law, LLC, Tempe, Arizona, for Amicus Curiae Federal Housing Finance Agency.

Christian Schreiber, Chavez & Gertler LLP, Mill Valley, California, for Amici Curiae National Association of Consumer Advocates and National Consumer Law Center.

Dissent by Judge Lasnik.

OPINION

Richard and Kristin Zabriskie sued the Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae) under the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA). The district court, on cross-motions for summary judgment, held that Fannie Mae was a "consumer reporting agency" within the meaning of the FCRA. We have jurisdiction under...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases