1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 912 F.3d
  5. 912 F.3d 509 (2018)
 

SANDOVAL v. COUNTY OF SONOMA

No. 16-16122, No. 16-16131, No. 16-16132.

912 F.3d 509 (2018)

Rafael Mateos SANDOVAL; Simeon Avendano Ruiz, Individually and as Class Representatives, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. COUNTY OF SONOMA; Sonoma County Sheriff's Office; Steve Freitas, Defendants, and City of Santa Rosa; Santa Rosa Police Department; Tom Schwedhelm, Defendants-Appellants. Rafael Mateos Sandoval; Simeon Avendano Ruiz, Individually and as Class Representatives, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. County of Sonoma; Sonoma County Sheriff's Office; Steve Freitas, Defendants-Appellants, and City of Santa Rosa; Santa Rosa Police Department; Tom Schwedhelm, Defendants. Rafael Mateos Sandoval; Simeon Avendano Ruiz, Individually and as Class Representatives, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. County of Sonoma; Sonoma County Sheriff's Office; Steve Freitas; City of Santa Rosa; Santa Rosa Police Department; Tom Schwedhelm, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Filed December 21, 2018.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Timothy T. Coates (argued) and Alison M. Turner, Greines Martin Stein & Richland LLP, Los Angeles, California; Robert L. Jackson, Assistant City Attorney, City Attorney's Office, Santa Rosa, California; for Defendants-Appellants/Cross-Appellees City of Santa Rosa, Santa Rosa Police Department, and Tom Schwedhelm.

Anne L. Keck (argued), Keck Law Offices, Santa Rosa, California; Richard W. Osman, Bertrand Fox Elliott Osman & Wenzel, San Francisco, California; for Defendants-Appellants/Cross-Appellees County of Sonoma, Sonoma County Sheriff's Office, and Steve Freitas.

Donald W. Cook (argued), Los Angeles, California; Alicia Roman, Law Office of Alicia Roman, Santa Rosa, California; for Plaintiffs-Appellees/Cross-Appellants.

Morris G. Hill, Senior Deputy; Thomas E. Montgomery, County Counsel; Office of County Counsel, San Diego, California; for Amicus Curiae California State Association of Counties.

Concurrence by Judge Watford.

OPINION

California state law provides that a peace officer may impound a vehicle for 30 days if the vehicle's driver has never been issued a driver's license. Relying on this statute, local authorities in California impounded two vehicles because their drivers had...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases