1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 909 F.3d
  5. 909 F.3d 1375 (2018)
 

VIRNETX INC. v. APPLE, INC.

2017-2490, 2017-2494.

909 F.3d 1375 (2018)

VIRNETX INC., Appellant v. APPLE, INC., Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Decided: December 10, 2018.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

IGOR VICTOR TIMOFEYEV , Paul Hastings LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellant. Also represented by NAVEEN MODI , STEPHEN BLAKE KINNAIRD , JOSEPH PALYS , MICHAEL WOLFE , DANIEL ZEILBERGER .

JOHN C. O'QUINN , Kirkland & Ellis LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by NATHAN S. MAMMEN ; SCOTT BORDER , JEFFREY PAUL KUSHAN , Sidley Austin LLP, Washington, DC.

Before Newman, O'Malley, and Chen, Circuit Judges.

VirnetX Inc. ("VirnetX") appeals from two final written decisions of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board ("Board") finding that Apple Inc. ("Apple") had demonstrated by a preponderance of the evidence that claims 1-11, 14-25, and 28-30 of U.S. Patent No. 8,504,696 ("the '696 patent") were unpatentable as obvious. VirnetX...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases