ENPLAS DISPLAY DEVICE v. SEOUL SEMICONDUCTOR

2016-2599.

909 F.3d 398 (2018)

ENPLAS DISPLAY DEVICE CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant Enplas Tech Solutions, Inc., Enplas (U.S.A.), Inc., Plaintiffs v. SEOUL SEMICONDUCTOR COMPANY, LTD., Defendant-Appellee

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Decided: November 19, 2018.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

JOHN C. ROZENDAAL , Sterne Kessler Goldstein & Fox, PLLC, Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by MICHAEL E. JOFFRE .

LAWRENCE J. GOTTS , Latham & Watkins LLP, Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by GABRIEL BELL ; CHARLES SANDERS , Boston, MA; RYAN OWENS , Costa Mesa, CA.

Opinion concurring in part, dissenting in part filed by Circuit Judge Newman.


Enplas Display Device Corporation appeals the district court's summary judgment that claim 20 of Seoul Semiconductor Company, Ltd.'s ("SSC") U.S. Patent No. 6,007,209 is not anticipated. Following a jury trial on the remaining infringement and invalidity...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases