OREXO AB v. ACTAVIS ELIZABETH LLC

2017-1333.

903 F.3d 1265 (2018)

OREXO AB, Orexo US Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants v. ACTAVIS ELIZABETH LLC, Defendant-Appellee

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Decided: September 10, 2018.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

ERROL TAYLOR , Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy, LLP, New York, NY, argued for plaintiffs-appellants. Also represented by ANNA BROOK , JORDAN P. MARKHAM , FREDRICK ZULLOW .

GEORGE C. LOMBARDI , Winston & Strawn LLP, Chicago, IL, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by TYLER JOHANNES , MICHAEL KEENAN NUTTER , IVAN MICHAEL POULLAOS ; GEOFFREY P. EATON , Washington, DC.

Before Newman, Hughes, and Stoll, Circuit Judges.


Orexo AB and Orexo US Inc. (collectively "Orexo") appeal the decision of the United States District Court for the District of Delaware, holding claims 1, 3-6, and 8-10 of U.S. Patent No. 8,940,330 ("the '330 Patent") invalid on the ground of obviousness.1 The '330 Patent, entitled "Abuse-Resistant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases