SEA BREEZE SALT, INC. v. MITSUBISHI CORP.

No. 16-56350.

899 F.3d 1064 (2018)

SEA BREEZE SALT, INC., a California corporation; Innofood, S.A. de C.V., a Mexican corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. MITSUBISHI CORPORATION, a Japanese corporation; Mitsubishi International Corporation, a New York corporation; Exportadora de Sal, S.A. de C.V., a Mexican corporation; Does, 1-10, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Filed August 15, 2018.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Rory S. Miller (argued), David Zarmi , and G. Jill Basinger , Glaser Weil Fink Howard Avchen & Shapiro LLP, Los Angeles, California, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.

Charles E. Davidow (argued) and Daniel A. Crane , Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison LLP, Washington, D.C., for Defendants-Appellees.

Before: Kim McLane Wardlaw and Andrew D. Hurwitz, Circuit Judges, and Wiley Y. Daniel, District Judge.


OPINION

The act of state doctrine limits judicial interference in foreign relations by precluding adjudication of the sovereign acts of other nations in United States courts. Because this antitrust action is fundamentally a challenge to the United Mexican States' determination about the exploitation of its own natural...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases