HILL v. ANDERSON

Nos. 99-4317/14-3718.

881 F.3d 483 (2018)

Danny HILL, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Carl ANDERSON, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Decided and Filed: February 2, 2018.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

ARGUED: Vicki Ruth Adams Werneke , FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER'S OFFICE, Cleveland, Ohio, for Appellant.

Peter T. Reed , OFFICE OF THE OHIO ATTORNEY GENERAL, Columbus, Ohio, for Appellee.

ON BRIEF: Vicki Ruth Adams Werneke , Lori B. Riga , FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER'S OFFICE, Cleveland, Ohio, for Appellant.

Peter T. Reed , Stephen E. Maher , OFFICE OF THE OHIO ATTORNEY GENERAL, Columbus, Ohio, for Appellee.

Before: MERRITT, MOORE, and CLAY, Circuit Judges.


OPINION

In this death penalty case out of Ohio, Danny Hill asserts in his habeas petition that he may not be executed because he is "intellectually disabled," as now defined in three Supreme Court cases decided in the past fifteen years.1

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases