1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 879 F.3d
  5. 879 F.3d 1369 (2018)
 

FLEXUSPINE, INC. v. GLOBUS MEDICAL, INC.

2017-1188, 2017-1189.

879 F.3d 1369 (2018)

FLEXUSPINE, INC., Plaintiff-Cross-Appellant v. GLOBUS MEDICAL, INC., Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Decided: January 19, 2018.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

MARK STRACHAN , Sayles Werbner, P.C., Dallas, TX, argued for plaintiff-cross-appellant. Also represented by E. SAWYER NEELY , DARREN PATRICK NICHOLSON ; TODD BLUMENFELD , BRETT MICHAEL PINKUS , JONATHAN TAD SUDER , Friedman, Suder & Cooke, Fort Worth, TX.

ARUN SUBRAMANIAN , Susman Godfrey LLP, New York, NY, argued for defendant-appellant. Also represented by JACOB W. BUCHDAHL , MARK HOWARD HATCH-MILLER ; JOHN PIERRE LAHAD , Houston, TX.

Before Prost, Chief Judge, Clevenger and Dyk, Circuit Judges.

Globus Medical, Inc., appeals the district court's decision denying its Rule 59(e) motion and denying as moot its Rule 50(b) motion. Flexuspine, Inc., cross-appeals from the district court's grant of summary judgment of noninfringement of its U.S. Patent No. 8,123,810 ("'810 patent"). We affirm the district court's decisions...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases