1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 851 F.3d
  5. 851 F.3d 1365 (2017)
 

IN RE CHUDIK

2016-1817.

851 F.3d 1365 (2017)

IN RE: Steven C. CHUDIK, Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Decided: March 27, 2017.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

GREGORY B. BEGGS, Law Offices of Gregory B. Beggs, Downers Grove, IL, argued for appellant.

MARY L. KELLY, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Michelle K. Lee. Also represented by NATHAN K. KELLEY, MEREDITH HOPE SCHOENFELD, THOMAS W. KRAUSE.

Before Dyk, Reyna, and Stoll, Circuit Judges.

Steven Chudik appeals from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board's ("Board") determination that claims 1, 15, 18, and 33-40 of U.S. Patent Application 11/525,631 ("'631 application") are anticipated by two prior art references. Because substantial evidence does not support the Board's determination, we reverse.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases