1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 845 F.3d
  5. 845 F.3d 866 (2017)
 

KING v. NEWBOLD

No. 15-1302.

845 F.3d 866 (2017)

Raymond E. KING, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Steven M. NEWBOLD, et al., Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Decided January 12, 2017.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Meredith Martin Addy , Attorney, Tabet, Divito & Rothstein, Kimberly A. Beis , Stephen Benson , Attorneys, Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Mary Ellen Welsh , Attorney, Office of the Attorney General, Civil Appeals Division, Michael John Charysh , Richard A. Tjepkema , Attorneys, Charysh & Schroeder, Ltd., Chicago, IL, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before Wood, Chief Judge, Rovner and Sykes, Circuit Judges.

A defect in appellate jurisdiction prevents us from reaching the merits of this appeal. The threshold jurisdictional question is simple: Did the district court abuse its discretion in granting an untimely motion for a Rule 54(b) judgment? Our precedent is clear: An untimely Rule 54(b) motion may be granted only if there is...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases