1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 830 F.3d
  5. 830 F.3d 1075 (2016)
 

U.S. v. LUSTIG

No. 14-50549.

830 F.3d 1075 (2016)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael LUSTIG, AKA George, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Filed July 29, 2016.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Timothy A. Scott (argued) and Nicolas O. Jimenez , Coleman, Balogh & Scott LLP, San Diego, California, for Defendant-Appellant.

Helen H. Hong (argued), Assistant United States Attorney; Peter Ko , Chief, Appellate Section, Criminal Division; Laura E. Duffy , United States Attorney; United States Attorney's Office, San Diego, California; for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Concurrence by Judge Watford

OPINION

The United States Supreme Court held in Riley v. California, ___ U.S. ___, 134 S.Ct. 2473, 189 L.Ed.2d 430 (2014), that the Fourth Amendment requires law enforcement officers to obtain a warrant before they may search an arrestee's cell phone. Approximately two...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases