CURIEL v. MILLER

No. 11-56949.

830 F.3d 864 (2016)

Freddy CURIEL, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Amy MILLER, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Filed July 25, 2016.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jan B. Norman (argued), Altadena, California, for Petitioner-Appellant.

Kevin Vienna (argued), Supervising Deputy Attorney General; Angela M. Borzachillo , Deputy Attorney General; Julie L. Garland , Senior Assistant Attorney General; Kamala D. Harris , Attorney General; Office of the Attorney General, San Diego, California; for Respondent-Appellee.

Concurrence by Judge Bybee.


OPINION

This case concerns the timeliness of Freddy Curiel's federal habeas petition under the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 ("AEDPA"). We hold that the district court erred in dismissing Curiel's habeas petition as untimely.

BACKGROUND...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases