NAAMJP v. LYNCH

No. 15-1982.

826 F.3d 191 (2016)

NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF MULTIJURISDICTION PRACTICE (NAAMJP); Marinna L. Callaway; Jose Jehuda Garcia; Dale E. Workman; W. Peyton George, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Loretta E. LYNCH, Attorney General; Deborah K. Chasanow, Chief Judge; Richard D. Bennett, United States District Court for the District of Maryland; Catherine C. Blake, United States District Court for the District of Maryland; James K. Bredar, United States District Court for the District of Maryland; Theodore D. Chuang, United States District Court for the District of Maryland; Marvin J. Garbis, United States District Court for the District of Maryland; Paul W. Grimm, United States District Court for the District of Maryland; George J. Hazel, United States District Court for the District of Maryland; Ellen L. Hollander, United States District Court for the District of Maryland; Peter J. Messitte, United States District Court for the District of Maryland; Frederick J. Motz, United States District Court for the District of Maryland; William M. Nickerson, United States District Court for the District of Maryland; William D. Quarles, Jr., United States District Court for the District of Maryland; George L. Russell, III, United States District Court for the District of Maryland; Roger W. Titus, United States District Court for the District of Maryland, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Decided: June 17, 2016.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

ARGUED: Joseph Robert Giannini , Los Angeles, California, for Appellants. Brian Paul Hudak , Office of the United States Attorney, Washington, D.C., for Appellees. ON BRIEF: Rod J. Rosenstein , United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, Alan Burch , Special Assistant United States Attorney, Office of the United States Attorney, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.

Affirmed by published opinion. Judge GIBNEY wrote the opinion, in which Judge FLOYD and Judge THACKER joined.


"`Membership in the bar is a privilege burdened with conditions.'" Theard v. United States, 354 U.S. 278, 281, 77 S.Ct. 1274, 1 L.Ed.2d 1342 (1957) (quoting In re Rouss, 221 N.Y. 81, 84, 116 N.E. 782, 783 (1917)). The National Association for the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases