1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 783 F.3d
  5. 783 F.3d 1374 (2015)
 

BIOSIG INSTRUMENTS, INC. v. NAUTILUS, INC.

No. 2012-1289.

783 F.3d 1374 (2015)

BIOSIG INSTRUMENTS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant v. NAUTILUS, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

April 27, 2015.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mark David Harris, Proskauer Rose LLP, New York, N.Y., argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by Paul Milcetic, Villanova, PA; Todd Kupstas, Kessler Topaz Meltzer & Check, LLP, Radnor, PA; Daniel C. Mulveny, Barnes & Thornburg LLP, Wilmington, DE; John E. Roberts, Proskauer Rose LLP, Boston, MA.

John D. Vandenberg, Klarquist Sparkman, LLP, Portland, OR, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by James E. Geringer,   Philip J. Warrick,   Jeffrey S. Love.

Before NEWMAN, SCHALL, and WALLACH, Circuit Judges.

This case is before us on remand from the United States Supreme Court. Biosig Instruments, Inc. ("Biosig") is the assignee of U.S. Patent No. 5,337,753 ("the '753 patent"), directed to a heart rate monitor associated with an exercise apparatus and/or exercise procedures. Biosig brought a patent infringement action against...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases