1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 783 F.3d
  5. 783 F.3d 1365 (2015)
 

INFO-HOLD, INC. v. MUZAK LLC

No. 2014-1167.

783 F.3d 1365 (2015)

INFO-HOLD, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant v. MUZAK LLC, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

April 24, 2015.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Daniel Joseph Wood, Info-Hold, Inc., Cincinnati, OH, James L. Kwak, Standley Law Group LLP, Dublin, OH, argued for plaintiff-appellant.

Barry Eastburn Bretschneider, Baker & Hostetler LLP, Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by Michael Edward Anderson,   Bridget Springer Merritt;   John Frank Murphy, Philadelphia, PA; Kevin W. Kirsch, Cincinnati, OH.

Before REYNA, WALLACH, and TARANTO, Circuit Judges.

This case comes before us on appeal of numerous rulings unfavorable to Info-Hold, Inc. ("Info-Hold"), owner of U.S. Patent No. 5,991,374 (the "'374 patent"), the sole patent in the dispute. Info-Hold asserted the '374 patent against Muzak LLC ("Muzak") and Applied Media Technologies Corporation ("AMTC") in separate

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases