AUGME TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v. YAHOO! INC.

Nos. 2013-1121, 2013-1195.

755 F.3d 1326 (2014)

AUGME TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant-Appellant, and World Talk Radio, LLC, Counterclaim Defendant-Appellant, v. YAHOO! INC., Defendant/Counterclaimant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

June 20, 2014.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jennifer A. Albert , Goodwin Procter LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for all appellants. With her on the brief were, Thomas J. Scott, Jr. , David M. Young , and Eleanor M. Yost. Of counsel on the brief was Gregory S. Bishop , of Menlo Park, CA.

Deanne E. Maynard , Morrison & Foerster LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for defendant/counterclaimant-appellee. With her on the brief were Daniel P. Muino , and Marc A. Hearron ; and Rachel Krevans and Richard S.J. Hung , of San Francisco, CA.

Before MOORE, SCHALL, and REYNA, Circuit Judges.


MOORE, Circuit Judge.

Augme Technologies, Inc. (Augme) sued Yahoo! Inc. (Yahoo!) alleging infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 6,594,691 and 7,269,636 (collectively, the Augme patents), and Yahoo! counterclaimed that Augme and World Talk Radio, LLC (collectively, Appellants) infringed certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 7,640,320. After claim construction, the court granted Yahoo! summary judgment of noninfringement. The district court also entered judgment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases