1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 738 F.3d
  5. 738 F.3d 1058 (2013)
 

PATEL v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES

No. 08-56567.

738 F.3d 1058 (2013)

Naranjibhai PATEL; Ramilaben Patel, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES, a municipal corporation, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Filed December 24, 2013.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Frank A. Weiser (argued), Law Offices of Frank A. Weiser, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.

Todd T. Leung (argued), Deputy City Attorney; Rockard J. Delgadillo , City Attorney; Laurie Rittenberg , Assistant City Attorney, Office of the City Attorney, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendant-Appellee.

Before: ALEX KOZINSKI, Chief Judge, and DIARMUID F. O'SCANNLAIN, RAYMOND C. FISHER, MARSHA S. BERZON, RICHARD C. TALLMAN, RICHARD R. CLIFTON, CONSUELO M. CALLAHAN, M. SMITH, MARY H. MURGUIA, MORGAN CHRISTEN and PAUL J. WATFORD, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

WATFORD, Circuit Judge:

Los Angeles Municipal Code § 41.49 requires hotel and motel operators to keep records with specified information about their guests. Plaintiffs, motel owners in Los Angeles, challenge a provision of § 41.49 authorizing warrantless, onsite inspections of those records upon the demand of any police officer. We are asked to decide whether this provision is facially invalid under the Fourth Amendment.

I

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases