U.S. v. PUNN

Docket No. 13-2780-cr.

737 F.3d 1 (2013)

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Rakesh K. PUNN, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Decided: December 6, 2013.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael K. Bachrach , Law Office of Michael K. Bachrach, New York, N.Y. ( Steve Zissou , Elizabeth E. Macedonio , Bayside, NY, on the brief), for Defendant-Appellant.

Allen L. Bode ( David C. James , Assistant United States Attorney, on the brief), Assistant United States Attorney, for Loretta E. Lynch, United States Attorney, Eastern District of New York, New York, NY, for Appellee.

Before: POOLER, LYNCH, and DRONEY, Circuit Judges.


GERARD E. LYNCH, Circuit Judge:

This appeal requires us to decide whether an order denying a motion to quash grand jury subpoenas directed at third parties on the ground that the subpoenas were issued for the sole or dominant purpose of preparing for the movant's trial on a pending indictment is an immediately appealable order under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. Although this Court has addressed this issue on a number of occasions, our case law does not reflect a uniform...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases