COLON v. GOORD

No. 10-4693-pr.

ARMANDO COLON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GLENN S. GOORD, COMMISSIONER OF NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONAL SERVICES; DONALD SELSKY, DIRECTOR OF SPECIAL HOUSING AND INMATE DISCIPLINE; JOHN BURGE, SUPERINTENDENT OF AUBURN CORRECTIONAL FACILITY; MARK BRADT, FORMER DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF SECURITY AT AUBURN CORRECTIONAL FACILITY; JOHN ROURKE, CAPTAIN FOR SECURITY SERVICES AT AUBURN CORRECTIONAL FACILITY; CRAIG GUMMERSON, CAPTAIN FOR SECURITY SERVICES AT AUBURN CORRECTIONAL FACILITY; STEPHEN KOTT, CORRECTION COUNSELOR AT AUBURN CORRECTIONAL FACILITY; LUCIEN LECLAIRE, DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTIONAL FACILITIES FOR NYSDOCS; HAROLD GRAHAM, SUPERINTENDENT OF AUBURN CORRECTIONAL FACILITY; JOSEPH F. BELLNIER, DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT FOR SECURITY, AUBURN CORRECTIONAL FACILITY; S. WRIGHT, CORRECTION OFFICER AT AUBURN CORRECTIONAL FACILITY Defendants-Appellees, RICHARD ROY, DEPUTY COMMISSIONER AND ACTING INSPECTOR GENERAL FOR NYSDOCS; THERESA KNAPP-DAVID, DIRECTOR OF CLASSIFICATION AND MOVEMENT; C. BARRETTE, SERGEANT AT AUBURN CORRECTIONAL FACILITY; JOSEPH GIANOTTA, SERGEANT AT AUBURN CORRECTIONAL FACILITY; NORMAN AUSTIN, CORRECTION OFFICER AT AUBURN CORRECTIONAL FACILITY; DROCZAK, CORRECTION OFFICER AT AUBURN CORRECTIONAL FACILITY; VINCE KONECNY, CORRECTION OFFICER AT AUBURN CORRECTIONAL FACILITY; P. DONNELLY, CORRECTION OFFICER AT AUBURN CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, Defendants.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

May 31, 2013.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Armando Colon, pro se, Wallkill, New York, for Appellant.

Barbara D. Underwood , Solicitor General, Kathleen M. Treasure , Denise A. Hartman , Assistant Solicitors General, for Eric T. Schneiderman , Attorney General of the State of New York, Albany, New York, for Appellees.

PRESENT: CHESTER J. STRAUB, REENA RAGGI, CHRISTOPHER F. DRONEY,


SUMMARY ORDER

RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT'S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONICDATABASE(WITH THE NOTATION "SUMMARY ORDER"). A PARTY CITING TO A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases