1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. SHENOY v. CHARLOTTE-MECKLENBURG HOSPITAL AUTHORITY
 

SHENOY v. CHARLOTTE-MECKLENBURG HOSPITAL AUTHORITY

No. 12-1786.

B. VITTAL SHENOY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CHARLOTTE-MECKLENBURG HOSPITAL AUTHORITY, d/b/a Carolinas HealthCare System; MERCY HEALTH SERVICES, INCORPORATED; MERCY HOSPITAL, INCORPORATED; CAROLINAS PATHOLOGY GROUP, PA, Defendants-Appellees, and JAMES E.S. HYNES; MICHAEL C. TARWATER; PAUL S. FRANZ; C. CURTIS COPENHAVER; WILLIAM K. BROWN; DENNIS J. PHILLIPS; EDWARD H. LIPFORD, M.D.; MARIE-CLAIRE C. MARROUM, M.D.; FILMON M. SEXTON, M.D.; SANFORD P. BENJAMIN, M.D.; THE CHS BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS; PATHOLOGY ASSOCIATES SERVICES, INCORPORATED, Defendants. ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS, INCORPORATED, Amicus Supporting Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Decided: May 13, 2013.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

ARGUED: Mark Jay Prak , BROOKS, PIERCE, McLENDON, HUMPHREY & LEONARD, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellant.

Charles Evans Johnson , ROBINSON, BRADSHAW & HINSON, PA, Charlotte, North Carolina; William H. Sturges , SHUMAKER LOOP & KENDRICK, LLP, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellees.

ON BRIEF: Julia C. Ambrose , Eric M. David , BROOKS, PIERCE, MCLENDON, HUMPHREY & LEONARD, L.L.P., Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellant.

Susan Miller Huber , ROBINSON, BRADSHAW & HINSON, PA, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellees Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hospital Authority, d/b/a Carolinas HealthCare System, Mercy Health Services, Incorporated, and Mercy Hospital, Incorporated.

Frederick M. Thurman, Jr. , SHUMAKER LOOP & KENDRICK, LLP, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee Carolinas Pathology Group, PA. Andrew L. Schlafly , Far Hills, New Jersey, for Amicus Curiae.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

UNPUBLISHED

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Dr. Vittal Shenoy filed suit against Carolinas Healthcare Systems (CHS) and Carolinas Pathology Group (CPG), alleging several claims arising from the termination of his employment. The district court granted summary judgment to the defendants, and we affirm.

I.

Because the district court granted summary judgment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases