MAXWELL v. COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO

Nos. 10-56671, 10-56706.

708 F.3d 1075 (2013)

Jim MAXWELL, individually and as guardian of Trevor Allen Bruce and Kelton Tanner Bruce; Kay Maxwell, individually and as guardian of Trevor Allen Bruce and Kelton Tanner Bruce; Jim Maxwell, as executor of the Estate of Kristin Marie Maxwell-Bruce, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO; Alpine Fire Protection District; Viejas Fire Department; Lowell Bryan "Sam" Bruce, Deputy; Bradley Avi; Jeremy Felber; Gregory Reynolds; Anthony Salazar; M. Knobbe; Jeffrey Jackson; Warren Voth; Gary Kneeshaw; William Reilly; L. Rodriguez; Brian Boggeln; Colby Ross; Chip Howell; Michael Mead; Does, Defendants-Appellees. Jim Maxwell, individually and as guardian of Trevor Allen Bruce and Kelton Tanner Bruce; Kay Maxwell, individually and as guardian of Trevor Allen Bruce and Kelton Tanner Bruce; Jim Maxwell, as executor of the Estate of Kristin Marie Maxwell-Bruce, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. County of San Diego; Alpine Fire Protection District; Viejas Fire Department; Lowell Bryan "Sam" Bruce, Deputy; Bradley Avi; Jeremy Felber; Brian Boggeln; Colby Ross; Chip Howell; Michael Mead; Does, Defendants, and Gregory Reynolds; Anthony Salazar; M. Knobbe; Jeffrey Jackson; Warren Voth; Gary Kneeshaw; William Reilly; L. Rodriguez, Defendants-Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Filed February 14, 2013.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Daniel M. Benjamin , Ballard Spahr LLP, San Diego, CA, and Todd Thibodo , Law Offices of Todd Thibodo, Encino, CA, for Plaintiffs-Appellees/Plaintiffs-Appellants.

Morris G. Hill , Senior Deputy, San Diego County Counsel, San Diego, CA, for Defendants-Appellants Gregory Reynolds, Anthony Salazar, Michael Knobbe, Jeffrey Jackson, Warren Voth, Gary Kneeshaw, William Reilly, and Leonard Rodriguez.

Phillip C. Samouris , John M. Morris , and Victoria E. Fuller , Higgs, Fletcher & Mack LLP, San Diego, CA, for Defendants-Appellees Viejas Fire Department, Bradley Avi, and Jeremy Felber.

Opinion by Judge FARRIS; Dissent by Judge IKUTA.


ORDER

The panel has voted to deny the petition for rehearing in case number 10-56671; Judges Clifton and Ikuta vote to deny the petition for rehearing en banc, and Judge Farris so recommends.

Judges Farris and Clifton vote to deny the petition for rehearing in case number 10-56706; Judge Clifton votes to deny the petition for rehearing en banc, and Judge Farris so recommends. Judge Ikuta votes to grant the petition for rehearing and the petition for rehearing...

NEVER MISS A DECISION. START YOUR SUBSCRIPTION.

Uncompromising quality. Enduring impact.
Your support ensures a bright future for independent legal reporting.

As you are aware we have offered this as a free subscription over the past years and we have now made it a paid service.Look forward to your continued patronage.

GET STARTED


OR

Read it with your Leagle account.
Sign in to continue


Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases