FLUOR TEC, CORP. v. KAPPOS

No. 2012-1295, Reexamination No. 95/001,168.

FLUOR TEC, CORP., Appellant, v. DAVID J. KAPPOS, DIRECTOR, UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, Appellee, AND LUMMUS TECHNOLOGY, INC., Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Decided: December 11, 2012.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

ROBERT D. FISH , Fish & Associates, PC, of Irvine, California, argued for appellant. With him on the brief was MEI TSANG .

RAYMOND T. CHEN , Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, of Arlington, Virginia, argued for appellee, United States Patent and Trademark Office. With him on the brief were AMY J. NELSON and KRISTI L.R. SAWERT , Associate Solicitors.

JEFFREY S. BERGMAN , Osha Liang LLP, of Houston, Texas, argued for appellee, Lummus Technology, Inc.

Before LOURIE, BRYSON, and WALLACH, Circuit Judges.


This disposition is nonprecedential.

LOURIE, Circuit Judge.

Fluor Tec, Corp. ("Fluor") appeals from the decision of the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (the "Board") in an inter partes reexamination affirming the Examiner's decision not to reject claims 1-9, 11, 13, 25-29, 31, 33, 37-47, 55, 56, and 58 of U.S. Patent 6,712,880 (the "'880 patent") owned by Lummus Technology, Inc. ("Lummus"). See Fluor Tec, Corp. v. Patent of Lummus Tech...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases