1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. IN RE SUTTON
 

IN RE SUTTON

No. 2012-1255, Serial No. 12/190,101.

IN RE STEVEN SUTTON AND STEPHEN THORP

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Decided: November 20, 2012.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

ANTON J. HOPEN , Smith & Hopen, P.A., of Oldsmar, Florida, for appellants.

RAYMOND T. CHEN , Solicitor, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, of Alexandria, Virginia, for Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office. With him on the brief were JAMIE L. SIMPSON and NATHAN K. KELLEY , Associate Solicitors.

Before PROST, MOORE, and O'MALLEY, Circuit Judges

This disposition is nonprecedential.

PER CURIAM.

Steven Sutton and Stephen Thorp (collectively "Sutton") appeal from the decision of the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences ("Board") affirming the rejection of claims 7-9, 14, 19, and 30 of U.S. Patent Application No. 12/190,101 ("the '101 application") as obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a). Because the Board's conclusion is supported by substantial evidence and not legally erroneous, we affirm...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases