1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 698 F.3d
  5. 698 F.3d 1091 (2012)
 

DAY v. AT & T DISABILITY INCOME PLAN

No. 10-16479.

698 F.3d 1091 (2012)

David DAY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AT & T DISABILITY INCOME PLAN, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Filed July 3, 2012.

Amended November 1, 2012.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert Nichols , San Jose, CA, for the appellant.

Stephen H. Harris (argued), Caroline L. Elkin and Melinda A. Gordon , Paul, Hastings, Janofsky and Walker LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for the appellee.

Before: RAYMOND C. FISHER and JOHNNIE B. RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges, and ROBERT J. TIMLIN, District Judge.

ORDER

The opinion filed July 3, 2012, and reported at 685 F.3d 848, is amended as follows:

At slip opinion page 7859 n. 6, 685 F.3d at 857 n. 6, replace the sentence <To the extent Day requests fees for time spent pursuing summary judgment, he is not a prevailing party and is not therefore entitled to fees.> with <To the extent Day requests fees for time spent pursuing summary judgment, he is not entitled to fees...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases