1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 698 F.3d
  5. 698 F.3d 988 (2012)
 

U.S. v. FLUKER

Nos. 11-1013, 11-3008, 11-3082.

698 F.3d 988 (2012)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ronnanita FLUKER, Roy Fluker, III, and Roy Fluker, Jr., Defendants-Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Decided October 26, 2012.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stephen L. Heinze (argued), Attorney, Office of the United States Attorney, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Christopher W. Carmichael , Andre Fiske (argued), Attorneys, Holland & Knight LLP, John M. Beal (argued), John M. Beal, Attorney at Law, Thomas C. Brandstrader (argued), Attorney, Chicago, IL, for Defendants-Appellants.

Ronnanita Fluker, Alderson, WV, pro se.

Before BAUER, MANION, and TINDER, Circuit Judges.

BAUER, Circuit Judge.

This case proves the old adage, "If something sounds too good to be true, it probably is." Following a three-week trial, Roy Fluker, Jr. ("Roy Jr."), Roy Fluker III ("Roy III"), and Ronnanita Fluker ("Ronnanita"), (collectively, the "Appellants"), were found guilty of charges related to their participation in various fraudulent, Ponzi-like schemes that duped victims into investing millions of dollars into programs that were destined to fail....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases