PATEL v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES

No. 08-56567.

686 F.3d 1085 (2012)

Naranjibhai PATEL and Ramilaben Patel, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES, a municipal corporation, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Filed July 17, 2012.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Frank A. Weiser , Los Angeles, CA, for appellants Naranjibhai Patel and Ramilaben Patel.

Rockard J. Delgadillo , City Attorney, Laurie Rittenberg , Assistant City Attorney, Todd Leung (argued), Deputy City Attorney, Los Angeles, CA, for appellee City of Los Angeles.

Opinion by Judge CLIFTON; Dissent by Judge PREGERSON.


OPINION

CLIFTON, Circuit Judge:

Plaintiffs Naranjibhai Patel and Ramilaben Patel are owners and operators of motels in Los Angeles. They challenge the constitutionality of Los Angeles Municipal Code (LAMC) § 41.49, which requires operators of hotels in the City to maintain certain guest registry information and to make that information available to police officers on request. Appellants contend that LAMC § 41.49 is facially unconstitutional under...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases