1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 682 F.3d
  5. 682 F.3d 463 (2012)
 

WASEK v. ARROW ENERGY SERVICES, INC.

No. 10-2418.

682 F.3d 463 (2012)

Harold WASEK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ARROW ENERGY SERVICES, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Decided and Filed: June 20, 2012.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

ARGUED: Mandel I. Allweil, Hurlburt, Tsiros & Allweil P.C., Saginaw, Michigan, for Appellant. Deanna Swisher, Foster, Swift, Collins & Smith, P.C., Lansing, Michigan, for Appellee. ON BRIEF: Mandel I. Allweil, Hurlburt, Tsiros & Allweil P.C., Saginaw, Michigan, for Appellant. Deanna Swisher, Foster, Swift, Collins & Smith, P.C., Lansing, Michigan, for Appellee.

Before: GRIFFIN and KETHLEDGE, Circuit Judges; and THAPAR, District Judge.

OPINION

AMUL R. THAPAR, District Judge.

Harold Wasek claims that he was harassed and bullied while working for his employer, Arrow Energy Services, Inc. He cannot show, however, that the bullying and harassment occurred because of his gender. As such, Wasek cannot maintain an action under either Title VII or Michigan's Elliot-Larsen Civil Rights Act ("ELCRA"). Thus, we affirm the district court's grant of summary judgment to Arrow Energy.

I.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases