EATON v. INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS

No. 10-3214.

657 F.3d 551 (2011)

Autumn EATON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Pendleton Juvenile Corrections Facility, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Decided September 9, 2011.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David M. Henn (argued), Attorney, McClure McClure Davis & Henn, Greenwood, IN, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Frances Barrow (argued), Laura L. Bowker , Attorneys, Office of the Attorney General, Indianapolis, IN, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before ROVNER and WOOD, Circuit Judges, and GOTTSCHALL, District Judge.


GOTTSCHALL, District Judge.

Autumn Eaton sued her employer, the Indiana Department of Corrections, Pendleton Juvenile Corrections Facility ("DOC"), under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2, alleging that DOC discriminated against her on the basis of gender when it terminated her employment.

The district court granted summary judgment in favor of DOC, and Eaton's appeal followed. On appeal, Eaton argues that the district court...

NEVER MISS A DECISION. START YOUR SUBSCRIPTION.

Uncompromising quality. Enduring impact.
Your support ensures a bright future for independent legal reporting.

As you are aware we have offered this as a free subscription over the past years and we have now made it a paid service.Look forward to your continued patronage.

GET STARTED


OR

Read it with your Leagle account.
Sign in to continue


Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases