HYATT v. KAPPOS

No. 2007-1066.

625 F.3d 1320 (2010)

Gilbert P. HYATT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. David KAPPOS, Director, Patent and Trademark Office, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

November 8, 2010.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Aaron M. Panner , Kellogg, Huber, Hansen, Todd, Evans & Figel, P.L.L.C., of Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff-appellant on rehearing en banc. Of counsel on the brief were Michael L. Martinez , Crowell & Moring LLP, of Washington, DC, and Gregory L. Roth , Law Offices of Gregory L. Roth, of La Palma, CA. On the initial brief were Michael L. Martinez and Michael I. Coe , Crowell & Moring LLP, of Washington, DC. Of counsel on the brief was Gregory L. Roth , Law Offices of Gregory L. Roth, of La Palma, CA. Of counsel was Kenneth C. Bass, III , Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C., of Washington, DC, and J. Robert Chambers , Wood Herron & Evans, LLP, of Cincinnati, OH.

Beth S. Brinkmann , Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Appellate Staff, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee on rehearing en banc. With her on the brief were Tony West , Assistant Attorney General, and Scott R. McIntosh and Mark R. Freeman , Attorneys. Of counsel on the brief were Raymond T. Chen , Solicitor, and Robert J. McManus and Thomas W. Krause , Associate Solicitors, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, of Arlington, VA. On initial brief were Stephen Walsh , Acting Solicitor, and Robert J. McManus and William G. Jenks , Associate Solicitors, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, of Arlington, VA. Of counsel were Raymond T. Chen , Acting Solicitor, and Thomas W. Krause , Associate Solicitor.

Maxim H. Waldbaum , Schiff Hardin LLP, of New York, NY, for amicus curiae Federation Internationale Des Conseils en Propriete Industrielle on rehearing en banc.

Mark J. Abate , New York Intellectual Property Law Association, of New York, NY, for amicus curiae New York Intellectual Property Law Association on rehearing en banc.

Daniel B. Ravicher , Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law, of New York, NY, for amicus curiae Public Patent Foundation on rehearing en banc.

Herbert C. Wamsley , Intellectual Property Owners Association, of Washington, DC, for amicus curiae Intellectual Property Owners Association on rehearing en banc. On the brief were Douglas K. Norman and Kevin H. Rhodes , Intellectual Property Owners Association, of Washington, DC; and Robert M. Isackson , Nicholas H. Lam , and Jacob A. Snow , Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, of New York, NY.

Lauren A. Degnan , Fish & Richardson, P.C., of Washington, DC, for amicus curiae Intel Corporation on rehearing en banc. With her on the brief was John A. Dragseth , of Minneapolis, MN. Of counsel on the brief was Harry F. Manbeck, Jr. , Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck P.C., of Washington, DC.

Ann M. McCrackin , Franklin Pierce Law Center, of Concord, NH, for amicus curiae Franklin Pierce Law Center on rehearing en banc. With her on the brief was J. Jeffrey Hawley .

Vernon M. Winters , Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP, of Redwood Shores, CA for amicus curiae American Intellectual Property Law Association on rehearing en banc. With him on the brief was Alan J. Kasper , American Intellectual Property Law Association, of Arlington, VA.

Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge DYK, in which Circuit Judge GAJARSA joins.


MOORE, Circuit Judge.

Under the patent laws, a patent applicant who is dissatisfied with the decision of the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (Board) regarding his application may choose one of two paths. The applicant may appeal the Board's decision to the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, which will review the Board's decision on the record that was before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (Patent Office). Alternatively, the applicant may file...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases