Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
DOMINICK A. CONDE, Fitzpatrick, Cella, Harper & Scinto, of New York, New York, argued for plaintiffs-appellants. With him on the brief were JOHN D. CARLIN, NINA SHREVE, COLLEEN TRACY and TARA BYRNE.
WILLIAM A. RAKOCZY, Rakoczy Molino Mazzochi Siwik, LLP, of Chicago, Illinois, argued for defendants-appellees. With him on the brief were CHRISTINE J. SlWIK, ALICE L. RIECHERS, GREGORY A. DUFF and ROBERT M. TEIGEN.
Before LINN, MOORE, and FRIEDMAN, Circuit Judges.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
MOORE, Circuit Judge.
Adams Respiratory Therapeutics, Inc. (Adams) appeals the judgment of the district court that the guaifenesin product described in Perrigo Co.'s (Perrigo's) Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA) would not infringe the asserted claims of U.S. Patent No. 6,372,252 (the '252 patent). Because the court based its judgment of noninfringement on an erroneous claim construction, we vacate and remand.
Guaifenesin is an expectorant...
NEVER MISS A DECISION. START YOUR SUBSCRIPTION.
Uncompromising quality. Enduring impact.
Your support ensures a bright future for independent legal reporting.
As you are aware we have offered this as a free subscription over the past years and we have now made it a paid service.Look forward to your continued patronage.