BECTON, DICKINSON AND CO. v. TYCO HEALTHCARE GROUP

Nos. 2009-1053, 2009-1111.

616 F.3d 1249 (2010)

BECTON, DICKINSON AND COMPANY, Plaintiff-Cross Appellant, v. TYCO HEALTHCARE GROUP, LP, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied October 4, 2010.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William F. Lee , Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, of Boston, MA, argued for plaintiff-cross appellant. With him on the brief were William G. McElwain , Amy K. Wigmore , Todd C. Zubler and Arthur W. Coviello , of Washington, DC.

Frank P. Porcelli , Fish & Richardson P.C., of Boston, MA, argued for defendant-appellant. With him on the brief were John M. Skenyon , and Juanita R. Brooks , of San Diego, CA.

Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge MAYER. Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge GAJARSA.


MAYER, Circuit Judge.

Tyco Healthcare Group, LP ("Tyco") appeals a judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Delaware entered after a jury determined that Tyco's Monoject Magellan™ safety needles and blood collection devices literally infringed claims 1-4, 6, 12, 13, 15, 24 and 27 of U.S. Patent No. 5,348,544 (the "'544 patent"). Because we conclude that the district court incorrectly construed the "spring means" limitation of the asserted...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases