ORDER
The panel opinion in Nordyke v. King, 563 F.3d 439 (9th Cir.2009), is vacated and the case is remanded to that panel for further consideration in light of McDonald v. City of Chicago, ___ U.S. ___, 130 S.Ct. 3020, ___ L.Ed.2d ___ (2010).
611 F.3d 1015 (2010)
Russell Allen NORDYKE; Ann Sallie Nordyke, dba TS Trade Shows; Jess B. Guy; Duane Darr; William J. Jones; Daryl N. David; Tasiana Westyschyn; Jean Lee; Todd Baltes; Dennis Blair, R.L. Adams; Roger Baker; Mike Fournier; Virgil McVicker, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Mary V. KING; Gail Steele; Wilma Chan; Keith Carson; Scott Haggerty; County of Alameda; County of Alameda Board of Supervisors, Defendants-Appellees.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
July 12, 2010.
July 12, 2010.
Donald Kilmer, Jr., The Law Offices of Donald Kilmer, San Jose, CA, Don B. Kates, Esquire, Battleground, WA, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.
Thomas Peter Pierce, Richards, Watson & Gershon, Los Angeles, CA, Sayre Weaver, Esquire, Richards, Watson & Gershon, Brea, CA, Richard E. Winnie, Esquire, Oakland, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.
Before ALEX KOZINSKI, Chief Judge, HARRY PREGERSON, STEPHEN REINHARDT, DIARMUID F. O'SCANNLAIN, PAMELA ANN RYMER, MICHAEL DALY HAWKINS, SUSAN P. GRABER, RONALD M. GOULD, RICHARD C. TALLMAN, MILAN D. SMITH, JR. and SANDRA S. IKUTA, Circuit Judges.
The panel opinion in Nordyke v. King, 563 F.3d 439 (9th Cir.2009), is vacated and the case is remanded to that panel for further consideration in light of McDonald v. City of Chicago, ___ U.S. ___, 130 S.Ct. 3020, ___ L.Ed.2d ___ (2010).
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
Comment
User Comments