MAJESKI v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INS. CO.

No. 09-1930.

590 F.3d 478 (2009)

Kirsten MAJESKI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE CO., Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Decided December 29, 2009.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mark D. Debofsky (argued), Daley, Debofsky & Bryant, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Teresa W. Roseborough (argued), Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, New York, NY, for Defendant-Appellee.

Before WOOD, EVANS, and TINDER, Circuit Judges.


WOOD, Circuit Judge.

Kirsten Majeski was employed by Metropolitan Life Insurance Company ("MetLife") and participated in MetLife's Short Term Disability Plan, which is governed by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act ("ERISA"). This appeal concerns MetLife's decision to reject Majeski's claim for short-term disability benefits. MetLife determined that Majeski had failed to submit enough evidence to support her claim. Majeski filed suit, but the district court...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases