1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. TOUCHCOM, INC. v. BERESKIN & PARR
 

TOUCHCOM, INC. v. BERESKIN & PARR

No. 2008-1229.

TOUCHCOM, INC. and TOUCHCOM TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. BERESKIN & PARR and H. SAMUEL FROST, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Revised: August 4, 2009

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Sheron Korpus, Kasowitz, Benson, Torres & Friedman, LLP, of New York, New York, argued for plaintiffs-appellants. With him on the brief was Michael S. Shuster.

G. Luke Ashley, Thompson & Knight L.L.P., of Dallas, Texas, argued for defendants-appellees. With him on the brief were John H. Martin, J. Michael Heinlen; and Peter E. Strand, Shook, Hardy & Bacon L.L.P., of Washington, DC.

Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge LOURIE. Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge PROST.

LOURIE, Circuit Judge.

Touchcom, Inc. and Touchcom Technologies, Inc. (collectively "Touchcom") appeal from the final judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia dismissing Touchcom's malpractice suit against the law firm of Bereskin & Parr ("B&P") and attorney H. Samuel Frost. Touchcom, Inc. v. Bereskin & Parr, No. 07-CV-114, slip op. at 1 (E.D. Va. Feb. 4, 2008). The district court dismissed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases