1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. AMGINE TECHNOLOGIES (US), INC. v. MILLER
 

AMGINE TECHNOLOGIES (US), INC. v. MILLER

C.A. No. 2020-0537-JRS.

AMGINE TECHNOLOGIES (US), INC., Plaintiff, v. HAROLD ROY MILLER, JONATHAN DAVID MEYER MILLER, SEVEN MEDICAL INC., AMGINE TECHNOLOGIES US HOLDING, LLC, and AMGINE HOLDINGS LTD., Defendants.

Court of Chancery of Delaware.

Date Decided: November 29, 2021.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Emily V. Burton Esquire , and Alberto E. Chávez Esquire , of Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP, Wilmington, Delaware, Attorneys for Plaintiff.

Srinivas M. Raju Esquire , and Angela Lam Esquire , of Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A., Wilmington, Delaware; Michael C. Holmes, Esquire , Margaret Dunlay Terwey Esquire , and Meredith S. Jeanes Esquire , of Vinson & Elkins LLP, Dallas, Texas; and Christopher E. Duffy, Esquire , David A. Hoffman Esquire , and W. Logan Lewis Esquire , of Vinson & Elkins LLP, New York, New York, Attorneys for Defendants.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

In this action, Plaintiff, Amgine Technologies (US), Inc. ("Amgine US" or "Plaintiff"), challenges two purported instances of misconduct by Amgine US's former controlling stockholders—father and son Harold Roy Miller ("Roy") and Jonathan David Meyer Miller ("Jonathan").

NEVER MISS A DECISION. START YOUR SUBSCRIPTION.

Uncompromising quality. Enduring impact.
Your support ensures a bright future for independent legal reporting.

As you are aware we have offered this as a free subscription over the past years and we have now made it a paid service.Look forward to your continued patronage.

GET STARTED
OR

Read it with your Leagle account.
Sign in to continue


Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases