1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. AMGINE TECHNOLOGIES (US), INC. v. MILLER
 

AMGINE TECHNOLOGIES (US), INC. v. MILLER

C.A. No. 2020-0537-JRS.

AMGINE TECHNOLOGIES (US), INC., Plaintiff, v. HAROLD ROY MILLER, JONATHAN DAVID MEYER MILLER, SEVEN MEDICAL INC., AMGINE TECHNOLOGIES US HOLDING, LLC, and AMGINE HOLDINGS LTD., Defendants.

Court of Chancery of Delaware.

Date Decided: November 29, 2021.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Emily V. Burton Esquire, and Alberto E. Chávez Esquire, of Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP, Wilmington, Delaware, Attorneys for Plaintiff.

Srinivas M. Raju Esquire, and Angela Lam Esquire, of Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A., Wilmington, Delaware; Michael C. Holmes, Esquire, Margaret Dunlay Terwey Esquire, and Meredith S. Jeanes Esquire, of Vinson & Elkins LLP, Dallas, Texas; and Christopher E. Duffy, Esquire, David A. Hoffman Esquire, and W. Logan Lewis Esquire, of Vinson & Elkins LLP, New York, New York, Attorneys for Defendants.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

In this action, Plaintiff, Amgine Technologies (US), Inc. ("Amgine US" or "Plaintiff"), challenges two purported instances of misconduct by Amgine US's former controlling stockholders—father and son Harold Roy Miller ("Roy") and Jonathan David Meyer Miller ("Jonathan").

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases