IN RE HICKENLOOPER

Supreme Court Case No. 13SA214.

312 P.3d 153 (2013)

2013 CO 62

IN RE: Interrogatory Propounded by Governor John HICKENLOOPER Concerning the Constitutionality of Certain Provisions of Article XXI, § 3 of the Constitution of the State of Colorado.

Supreme Court of Colorado.

October 21, 2013.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John W. Suthers , Attorney General, Leeann Morrill , First Assistant Attorney General, Kathryn Starnella , Assistant Attorney General, Matthew D. Grove , Assistant Attorney General, Denver, Colorado, Attorneys for Colorado Secretary of State.

Heizer Paul Grueskin LLP, Mark G. Grueskin , Martha M. Tierney , Denver, Colorado, Attorneys for Senator Angela Giron, Senator John Morse, and the Colorado Democratic Party.

The Matthew C. Ferguson Law Firm, P.C., Matthew C. Ferguson , Aspen, Colorado, Attorneys for Libertarian Party and Gordon Roy Butt.

En Banc.


JUSTICE RICE delivered the Opinion of the Court.

¶ 1 The Governor of the State of Colorado submitted an Interrogatory to this Court pursuant to Article VI, section 3, of the Colorado Constitution asking whether the prior participation requirement in Article XXI, section 3, of the Colorado Constitution conflicts with the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution. This Court exercised its original jurisdiction and issued an Order holding...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases