MURPHY v. TWITTER, INC.

No. A158214.

60 Cal.App.5th 12 (2021)

MEGHAN MURPHY, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. TWITTER, INC., et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division One.

January 22, 2021.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dhillon Law Group, Harmeet K. Dhillon ; Michael Yamamoto and Gregory R. Michael for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr, Patrick J. Carome , Ari Holtzblatt and Thomas G. Sprankling for Defendants and Respondents.

Jenner & Block, Luke C. Platzer ; National Center for Lesbian Rights, Shannon Minter , Asaf Orr ; Zeb C. Zankel ; Ethan C. Wong ; Vaughn E. Olson ; GLBTQ Advocates & Defenders and Jennifer Levi for National Center for Lesbian Rights, LAMBDA Legal Defense and Education Fund, Inc., GLBTQ Legal Advocates & Defenders, Transgender Law Center and The Human Rights Campaign as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Defendants and Respondents.

Perkins Coie and James G. Snell for Internet Association, Facebook, Inc., Glassdoor, Inc., Google LLC and Reddit, Inc., as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Defendants and Respondents.


[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*]

OPINION

When Meghan Murphy posted several messages critical of transgender women on Twitter, the company took down her posts and informed her she had violated its hateful conduct rules. After she posted additional similar messages...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases