1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. STANIFORTH v. JUDGES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM
 

STANIFORTH v. JUDGES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM

No. D068174.

FAY STANIFORTH et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. THE JUDGES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Defendant and Respondent; JOHN CHIANG, as State Controller, etc., Real Party in Interest and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division One.

March 29, 2016.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jorn S. Rossi and Paul G. Mast for all Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Reed Smith, Harvey L. Leiderman , Dennis P. Maio and Jeffrey R. Rieger for Defendant and Respondent.

No appearance for Real Party in Interest and Respondent.

More than 35 years ago, our Supreme Court issued its opinion in Olson v. Cory (1980) 27 Cal.3d 532 (Olson I) addressing a 1976 amendment to the then-existing version of Government Code1 section 68203 (section 68203). The Olson I opinion examined...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases